This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by GOODWIN, J. T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

"Cover your Tracks"

A Case Study of Genre, Rhetoric, and Ideology in Two Psycholegal Reports

University of Waterloo

Expert legal reports exhibit what Carolyn Miller calls the "pragmatic dimension" of genre, namely, a capacity to engage in two very different kinds of discursive activities simultaneously: The first, what I call the strategic function, "helps virtual communities, the relationships we carry around in our heads, to reproduce and reconstruct themselves," and the second, what I call the tactical function, "help[s] real people in spatio-temporal communities to do their work and carry out their purposes" (75). This article examines two psycholegal reports, showing how these strategic and tactical activities work together in a way that is complementary and ideological: complementary, because the relationship is one of foreground to background, with the strategic activity of the report predominating—and thus covering over—its tactical operations; ideological, because both activities serve to naturalize and reproduce the status of experts and of the law generally.

Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Vol. 10, No. 2, 167-186 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/1050651996010002003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Jameson Implication versus Inference: Analyzing Writer and Reader Representations in Business Texts Business Communication Quarterly, December 1, 2004; 67(4): 387 - 411. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Clark The Impact of Candid Versus Legally Defensible Language on the Persuasiveness of Environmental Self-Assessments Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 1998; 35(3): 368 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]