This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1050651909346929v1 24/1/3    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mackiewicz, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Assertions of Expertise in Online Product Reviews

Auburn University

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mackiewicz{at}auburn.edu.

	Abstract

In online consumer reviews on Web sites such as Epinions, laypeople write and post their evaluations of technical products. But how do they get readers to take their opinions seriously? One way that online reviewers establish credibility is to assert expertise. This article describes 10 types of assertions that online reviewers used (along with the three broader categories of these types), explaining the method used to test the types for reliability. This testing revealed that the types are reliable. This study lays the groundwork for understanding how reviewers construct expertise and, therefore, credibility and for gauging readers' perceptions of reviews that contain these assertions.

First published on September 10, 2009, doi:10.1177/1050651909346929

Journal of Business and Technical Communication 2010;24:3.

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2010


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?