This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1050651908328882v1 23/2/216    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Spilka, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Practitioner Research Instruction

A Neglected Curricular Area in Technical Communication Undergraduate Programs

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, spilka{at}uwm.edu

Most technical communication practitioners conduct research throughout their careers. Yet, a survey of the Web sites of 114 undergraduate technical communication programs between September 2006 and April 2007 revealed that 65% (about two thirds) of these programs are providing minimal or no exposure to research instruction and therefore are not sufficiently preparing students to handle the types of research they will encounter in their upcoming careers. Given the disconnect between the centrality of research in the work that technical communicators do and the low presence of research instruction at the undergraduate level, academics need to look for ways to overcome institutional and other constraints in order to give research training greater priority in their undergraduate programs.

Key Words: technical communication • research • pedagogy • undergraduate curriculum

This version was published on April 1, 2009

Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Vol. 23, No. 2, 216-237 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1050651908328882


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?