Journal of Business and Technical Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beard, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Vol. 3, No. 2, 29-51 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/105065198900300203

An Assessment System for Collaborative-Writing Groups: Theory and Empirical Evaluation

John D. Beard

Wayne State University

Jone Rymer

Wayne State University

David L. Williams

Wayne State University

An assessment system for collaborative-writing projects helps create a positive learning experience for all group members by rewarding each individual for his or her participation. Unlike assessment systems that evaluate only the group product, the system proposed here balances product and process, the lat ter embracing individual skills at interacting and contributions to the collaborative composing. The results of a systematic study of students' atti tudes toward their classroom experiences seem to corroborate our perspective as practitioners: With this assessment system, group members felt that they participated fully and practiced effective interactional behaviors, that they be came involved in the collaborative-writing process, and that the reward system was fairer than a single group grade.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
C. Boiarsky
The Needs Assessment: Using Community Consulting Projects to Teach Business Communication
Business Communication Quarterly, March 1, 2004; 67(1): 58 - 69.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
P. B. Lowry, A. Curtis, and M. R. Lowry
Building a Taxonomy and Nomenclature of Collaborative Writing to Improve Interdisciplinary Research and Practice
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2004; 41(1): 66 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
P. November
Right- and Left-Brain Marketing Education
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 1993; 15(2): 3 - 12.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
T. BAKER
Collaborating the Course: Organized Flexibility in Professional Writing
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, July 1, 1991; 5(3): 275 - 284.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. Forman
Collaborative Business Writing: A Burkean Perspective for Future Research
Journal of Business Communication, June 1, 1991; 28(3): 233 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
A. H. DUIN
Computer-Supported Collaborative Writing: The Workplace and the Writing Classroom
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, April 1, 1991; 5(2): 123 - 150.
[Abstract]