Journal of Business and Technical Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHARNEY, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by FERREIRA-BUCKLEY, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Vol. 6, No. 1, 38-74 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/1050651992006001002

How Writing Quality Influences Readers' Judgments of Résumés in Business and Engineering

DAVIDA H. CHARNEY

Pennsylvania State University

JACK RAYMAN

Pennsylvania State University

LINDA FERREIRA-BUCKLEY

University of Texas at Austin

To help students enter a professional discourse community, teachers must assess how accurately they both understand the community's discourse practices. Our research investigated how job recruiters seeking to fill positions in mechanical engineering or marketing were influenced by the quality of writing in student résumés. The résumés varied in elaboration, sentence style, mechanics, and amount of relevant work experience. The recruiters rated the résumés to indicate their willingness to interview the students. We found that recruiters in the two fields—engineering and marketing—valued quite different writing features. When we subsequently asked students in business writing and technical writing classes to rate the same résumés, we found that they underestimated the importance of various writing features. Generally, however, students' ratings resembled those of the recruiters in their respective disciplines. This study documents how students can improve their résumés and provides insight into the variations of discourse practices in professional disciplines.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
J. B. Killoran
Self-Published Web Resumes: Their Purposes and Their Genre Systems
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, October 1, 2006; 20(4): 425 - 459.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
A. N. Shelby
Communication Quality Revisited: Exploring the Link with Persuasive Effects
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 1998; 35(3): 387 - 404.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
D. CHARNEY, J. H. NEWMAN, and M. PALMQUIST
"I'm Just No Good at Writing": Epistemological Style and Attitudes Toward Writing
Written Communication, July 1, 1995; 12(3): 298 - 329.
[Abstract]