This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by STRATMAN, J. F. Articles by BREEN, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Risk Communication, Metacommunication, and Rhetorical Stases in the Aspen-EPA Superfund Controversy

University of Colorado at Denver

CAROLYN BOYKIN

University of Colorado at Denver

MARTI C. HOLMES

University of Colorado at Denver

M. JANE LAUFER

University of Colorado at Denver

MARION BREEN

University of Colorado at Denver

This article explores the relationship between current theoretical definitions of risk communication, the unique national role that EPA plays in defining health and environmental risks, and possible explanations for EPA's inability to persuade the city of Aspen, Colorado, to accept its plan for a massive cleanup of toxic lead mine wastes. Many explanations for the reversal of EPA's cleanup plan at Aspen could be advanced, but we concentrate on the definition of risk communication upon which EPA's internal risk communication guidelines are based—guidelines that its field representatives are invited to follow. In particular, we now explore ownership messages conveyed through metacommunication conflict with EPA's risk communication guidelines.

Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Vol. 9, No. 1, 5-41 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/1050651995009001002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Blythe, J. T. Grabill, and K. Riley Action Research and Wicked Environmental Problems: Exploring Appropriate Roles for Researchers in Professional Communication Journal of Business and Technical Communication, July 1, 2008; 22(3): 272 - 298. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Venette, T. L. Sellnow, and P. A. Lang Metanarration's Role in Restructuring Perceptions of Crisis: NHTSA's Failure in the Ford-Firestone Crisis Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 2003; 40(3): 219 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. F. STRATMAN Readers' Perception of Bias in Public Education Documents: The Case of Ballot Booklets Written Communication, October 1, 2000; 17(4): 520 - 578. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. S. Rogers Disciplinary Distinction or Responsibility? Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 1996; 10(1): 112 - 123.