|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Activity, Context, Interaction, and Authority
Learning to Write Scientific Papers In Situ
ANN M. BLAKESLEE
Eastern Michigan University
Situated learning theories offer useful insights into how learning to write can be supported and transacted through interactions between newcomers and experienced practitioners in academic and professional domains. Reporting the findings from a study of a mentoring relationship in physics, this article addresses how such processes work to teach composing in advanced academic contexts and what can make them more or less effective. The author identifies and discusses three factors that may constrain situated learning in such contexts and the transmission of authority that purportedly occurs through such learning. These factors include newcomers' existing skills for, and approaches to, composing, which may limit their acquisition and use of new skills; the implicitness of situated learning, which may pose difficulties for newcomers as they struggle to grasp the conceptual complexity entailed in composing disciplinary texts; and the location and distribution of authority in practitioner/newcomer relationships, which may inhibit newcomers as they struggle to acquire and establish their own authority by making original contributions to their fields.
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Vol. 11, No. 2,
125-169 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1050651997011002001

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Markel
Time and Exigence in Temporal Genres
Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
January 1, 2009;
23(1):
3 - 27.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Russell
Rethinking the Articulation Between Business and Technical Communication and Writing in the Disciplines: Useful Avenues for Teaching and Research
Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
July 1, 2007;
21(3):
248 - 277.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Carter, M. Ferzli, and E. N. Wiebe
Writing to Learn by Learning to Write in the Disciplines
Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
July 1, 2007;
21(3):
278 - 302.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. MacIntosh-Murray
Poster Presentations as a Genre in Knowledge Communication: A Case Study of Forms, Norms, and Values
Science Communication,
March 1, 2007;
28(3):
347 - 376.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Abbott and P. Eubanks
How Academics and Practitioners Evaluate Technical Texts: A Focus Group Study
Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
April 1, 2005;
19(2):
171 - 218.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. P. Dannels
Teaching and Learning Design Presentations in Engineering: Contradictions between Academic and Workplace Activity Systems
Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
April 1, 2003;
17(2):
139 - 169.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Smith
The Role of Technical Expertise in Engineering and Writing Teachers' Evaluations of Students' Writing
Written Communication,
January 1, 2003;
20(1):
37 - 80.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Lunsford
Contextualizing Toulmin's Model in the Writing Classroom: A Case Study
Written Communication,
January 1, 2002;
19(1):
109 - 174.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. GEISLER
Textual Objects: Accounting for the Role of Texts in the Everyday Life of Complex Organizations
Written Communication,
July 1, 2001;
18(3):
296 - 325.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Rose and K. A McClafferty
A Call for the Teaching of Writing in Graduate Education
Educational Researcher,
March 1, 2001;
30(2):
27 - 33.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. RUSSELL
Rethinking Genre in School and Society: An Activity Theory Analysis
Written Communication,
October 1, 1997;
14(4):
504 - 554.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|