Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winsor, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Construction of Knowledge in Organizations: Asking the Right Questions about the Challenger

Dorothy A. Winsor

GMI Engineering & Management Institute

Previous research on the communication failures contributing to the Challenger's explosion tends to ask why it happened that various people in the organizations involved knew about the faulty O-rings but failed to pass on the information to decision makers. This is a faulty question, revealing assump tions many of us unconsciously share even when we consciously reject these as sumptions. This question implies a simplistic notion of knowledge and a conduit model of communication. Insights from the sociology of technology and the new rhetoricians can help us to form better questions about rhetoric in organizations.

Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Vol. 4, No. 2, 7-20 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/105065199000400201
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. Suchan
The Effect of High-Impact Writing on Decision Making Within a Public Sector Bureaucracy
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 1998; 35(3): 299 - 327.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Written CommunicationHome page
B. SAUER
Embodied Knowledge: The Textual Representation of Embodied Sensory Information in a Dynamic and Uncertain Material Environment
Written Communication, April 1, 1998; 15(2): 131 - 169.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
B. THACKER and J. F. STRATMAN
Transmuting Common Substances: The Cold Fusion Controversy and the Rhetoric of Science
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, October 1, 1995; 9(4): 389 - 424.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
M. L. Tucker, K. S. Powell, and G. Dale Meyer
Qualitative Research in Business Communication: A Review and Analysis
Journal of Business Communication, October 1, 1995; 32(4): 383 - 399.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
K. Rentz
Editorial: Negotiating the Field of Business Communication
Journal of Business Communication, June 1, 1993; 30(3): 233 - 240.
[PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
E. A. McCORD
The Business Writer, the Law, and Routine Business Communication: A Legal and Rhetorical Analysis
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, April 1, 1991; 5(2): 173 - 199.
[Abstract]