<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jbt.sagepub.com">
<title>Journal of Business and Technical Communication RSS feed -- OnlineFirst Articles</title>
<link>http://jbt.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Journal of Business and Technical Communication RSS feed -- OnlineFirst Articles</description>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Business and Technical Communication</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1050-6519</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jbt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1050651909353546v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jbt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1050651909353307v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jbt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1050651909353306v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jbt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1050651909353304v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://jbt.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://jbt.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Journal of Business and Technical Communication</title>
<url>http://jbt.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://jbt.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://jbt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1050651909353546v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Foregrounding Positive Problem-Solving Teamwork: Awareness and Assessment Exercises for the First Class and Beyond]]></title>
<link>http://jbt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1050651909353546v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In an advanced technical and professional writing course, a pair of in-class exercises integrates the teaching of teamwork with other class topics of project management and observation-based research. The first exercise introduces teamwork in a positive way, by raising awareness of strategies for solving problems successfully. The second exercise follows up on the first, focusing on assessment of problem-solving teamwork. The pair of exercises is memorable and effective, showing students in an engaging, thought-provoking way that they have control and responsibility for the success of their teamwork. The materials for conducting the exercises, provided here, encourage reflection and discussion.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rehling, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:45:06 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1050651909353546</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Foregrounding Positive Problem-Solving Teamwork: Awareness and Assessment Exercises for the First Class and Beyond]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jbt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1050651909353307v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recycled Writing: Assembling Actor Networks From Reusable Content]]></title>
<link>http://jbt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1050651909353307v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Drawing on a study of writers reusing content from one document to another, this study examines the rhetorical purpose of reuse. Writing reuse is predominantly studied through the literature on single sourcing and enacted via technologies built on single-sourcing models. Such theoretical models and derivative technologies cast reusable content as contextless and rhetorically neutral, a perspective that overlooks the underlying rhetorical strategies of reuse. The author argues for a new understanding of reuse as a rhetorical act of creating hybrid utterances that gather their rhetorical strength by assembling ever larger and denser actor networks.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Swarts, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:45:05 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1050651909353307</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recycled Writing: Assembling Actor Networks From Reusable Content]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jbt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1050651909353306v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Creating Procedural Discourse and Knowledge for Software Users: Beyond Translation and Transmission]]></title>
<link>http://jbt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1050651909353306v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Although most theorists agree that discourse creates meaning, they have not adequately described how this process emerges within the creation of procedural knowledge. This article explores how technical communicators in diverse settings based discourse decisions on their knowledge of (a) users, (b) organizational image and constraints, (c) software structure and features, and (d) genre conventions in order to create communication artifacts designed to help users develop procedural knowledge. The transformations in which they engaged indicated that these technical communicators were skilled in forming images in these four areas and then using these images as they created meaning in procedural discourse. In this process, they moved beyond merely translating or transmitting technical knowledge.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hovde, M. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:45:05 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1050651909353306</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Creating Procedural Discourse and Knowledge for Software Users: Beyond Translation and Transmission]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jbt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1050651909353304v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Listening to Students: A Usability Evaluation of Instructor Commentary]]></title>
<link>http://jbt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1050651909353304v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Many students see instructor commentary as not constructive but prescriptive directions that must be followed so that their grade, not necessarily their writing, can be improved. Research offering heuristics for improving such commentary is available for guidance, but the methods employed to comment on writing still have not changed significantly, primarily because we lack sufficient understanding of how students use feedback. Usability evaluation is ideally equipped for assessing how students use commentary and how instructors might adapt their comments to make them more usable. This article reports on usability testing of commentary provided to students in an introductory technical writing course.
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Still, B., Koerber, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:33:40 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1050651909353304</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Listening to Students: A Usability Evaluation of Instructor Commentary]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>